Tasmania's gambling landscape is facing a critical juncture, with new policies proposed by the government that could potentially exacerbate the harm caused by problem gambling. This issue has sparked a debate between the state's gaming regulator and the government, with the former arguing that these policies will take Tasmania in the wrong direction. In this article, we'll delve into the key points of contention and explore the broader implications of these proposed changes.
The New Policies and Their Impact
The Tasmanian government's recent announcement of a new suite of poker machine policies has raised concerns among experts. These policies include allowing ATMs in venues with a $400 withdrawal limit, implementing a ticket-in ticket-out (TITO) system, and employing facial recognition technology. The gaming commission, tasked with implementing these policies by mid-2028, has expressed serious reservations.
One of the most contentious aspects is the introduction of ATMs in venues. The commission believes this could lead to greater harm, as it provides problem gamblers with easy access to additional cash, enabling them to chase losses immediately. This goes against the very principle of harm reduction.
The TITO system, designed to reduce the use of coins, is also under scrutiny. The commission argues that there's no evidence to support the claim that this system will protect players from harm. In fact, research suggests it could increase spending by up to 20%, creating a potential 'spending effect' that could be detrimental to players.
Lack of Consultation and Potential Risks
What makes this situation even more concerning is the apparent lack of consultation with the gaming commission. In letters obtained by ABC, the commission stated that they were not consulted prior to the policies being taken to cabinet for approval. This raises questions about the government's commitment to harm reduction and the expertise of the commission.
Furthermore, the commission has evidence suggesting that staggered opening hours for venues could lead to problem gamblers moving from one venue to another in the early hours, exacerbating their issues. This practice, if not addressed, could nullify any potential benefits of the reduced operating hours policy.
Defending the New Measures
Treasurer Eric Abetz, however, defends these new measures, stating that they are proportional, practical, and respect personal agency. He argues that the TITO system doesn't increase a player's funds but rather modernizes the system controls. Abetz also believes that ATMs in venues will assist with facial recognition technology and enforce limits.
Pokies Losses and the Need for Action
The context of increasing pokies losses since the end of COVID adds urgency to this debate. With players losing over $17.7 million in May alone, the need for effective harm reduction measures is evident. The change in the licensing model, giving venues ownership of their poker machine licenses, has also led to increased profits for venues, further highlighting the need for responsible gambling practices.
Broader Implications and the Way Forward
The disagreement between the government and the gaming commission underscores the complexity of addressing problem gambling. While the government's intentions may be to simplify processes and reduce financial burdens on venues, the potential harm to vulnerable individuals cannot be overlooked. It's crucial to strike a balance between economic interests and social responsibility.
In my opinion, this situation calls for a more collaborative approach. The government should engage in open dialogue with the gaming commission and other stakeholders to develop policies that truly reduce harm. By combining expertise and considering the broader social impact, Tasmania can move forward with a gambling landscape that prioritizes the well-being of its citizens.
